Most serious investors
December 6, 2010, this newspaper has reported,moncler piumini, Huaining County Public Security Bureau deputy director fees Zone Zhimin,tiffany milano,http://www.miaotoo.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, built with old friends work after residential, commercial,louboutin homme, distribution of benefits because of a dispute to court. Since the Court of First Instance considered building a partnership between civil servants and the behavior of people, from civil legal adjustments. This sentence one, the plaintiff can not agree. Recently, Anqing City Court upheld the hearing of the case.
Event Playback: Public Security Deputy Secretary cooperative housing provoke a lawsuit
Fees Zhimin is huaining County Public Security Bureau deputy director of Development Bureau, in 2007, under the charge repeatedly invited Zhimin, much of doing business in Beijing Hua Yan Chong decided to return home to invest in real estate development. Both sides verbally agreed: Most serious investors, charges a small part of the funding and access to five rooms. May 9, 2007, with his brother for a nominal Yan Hua, obtained through the auction part of the county health bureau idle state-owned land use rights, an area of about 1181 square meters. During project development, building fees Chi democracy if all the formalities and coordinate the operation of the peripheral relationships.
According to Yan Hua Chong's attorney introduced,http://www.ibaleads.com/item/95656, July 10,woolrich parka, 2009,http://bbs.kllhj.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=183635, without the consent fee Zhimin Yan Hua Chong case of consent,piumini peuterey, authorization of a dressing room in which the project is registered in the name of his wife,peuterey uomo, will be one of the residential units registered in their own name. Zhimin rejected due to costs related to the delivery of commercial procedures, resulting in houses can not be sold, Yan Hua Chong was forced to February 2,peuterey outlet,http://bbs.155.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, 2010 and the other signed an investment agreement confirmed, a clear distribution of profits in the agreement of both parties the proportion of the amount of each of the parties and other investments.
Thereafter,moncler outlet, the fee Zhimin and Yan Hua Chong project billing issues continue to communicate, but the two sides failed to reach consensus, but the conflict intensified, there was even a case of one door locked to prevent sales of the project. Yan Hua Chong eventually will charge Zhimin court.
Second trial argued: whether the agreement had signed invalid
During the first trial,louboutin, the focus of controversy is the case: whether the civil service fee Zhimin business,woolrich sito ufficiale, if yes, whether the two sides signed the agreement invalid.
August 8, Anqing City Intermediate People's Court hearing the case. Trial,piumini moncler, the plaintiffs lawyers, fees Zhimin as national civil servants, actively involved in real estate development projects, there is a clear profit distribution requirements, and in fact, forcibly took possession of a set of dressing rooms and two residential units, contrary to the "Chinese People Republic of the Civil Law "Article 53 paragraph (xiv) item" mandatory civil service shall not engage in or participate in profit-making activities, part-time positions in business or other for-profit organization. "The. Therefore, the agreement should be signed in accordance with the law invalidated.
Fang Zhimin and appellee fee is raised,woolrich sito ufficiale, house did not sell,spaccio woolrich,http://www.kuts.cn/dz3/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=155632, it is not business, no profit,woolrich uomo, no violation of civil service law; the defendant did business activities, is required by the agreement only share five houses,hogan interactive, the plaintiffs asked to confirm the agreement is invalid demands can not be established.
Trial, the two sides engaged in a fierce debate, due to the larger dispute, the case did not in court for sentencing.
Industry view: to increase the punishment for civil servants to do business
Reporters learned that the disputes on civil business,woolrich parka, is not uncommon,woolrich outlet, but often because the identity of the Civil Service,woolrich roma,http://www2s.biglobe.ne.jp/~nakaman/pers/custombbs.cgi/www.gcsfrance.fr/nike-tn-officiel/LwdsMvBhpkUjTLgoit/www.forzieri.fr/bottes-louboutin-pas-cher/,, often become the focus of public attention,http://ciwei.0736hn.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=53813&fromuid=4526, but also have a different understanding and attitudes towards the judiciary.
Anhui Province Administrative Law Bar Association Professional Committee of Chenyou Yong said that the way to earn some interest involved in the operation,woolrich uomo, that is business. But for the case of focus, as civil servants to conclude the agreement is valid,woolrich roma, the industry has two views: one is in violation of the relevant provisions of the "Civil Law" natural contract invalid. Second, the civil service law to adjust the internal management of the civil service, has signed a civil law does not affect behavior. "
Director of the Master of Laws, University of Science and Technology of China Education Center, Associate Professor Yang Hui believes that civil violation of the relevant provisions in the civil action can only be punished according to "Civil Law", and can not lead to relevant civil acts invalid.
Anhui Lawyer Donglin have argued that some mandatory provisions apply to judicial conduct, it is not easy to judge. But in the interview,http://d.smartinfohk.com/house3/home.php?mod=space&uid=2719&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=3892874, the civil service business, more intense social repercussions. The industry believes that the current behavior of civil servants to do business, there are loopholes in the mechanism, the need to increase the punishment for acts of civil business.
